So I've been toying with the idea of doing a regear in my '16 srw 68RFE w/ 3.42's and 35" tires. I'm in Saskatchewan, so were pretty famous for having some of the flattest highways around. And I actually have everything all planned out at the local diesel shop, have an appointment to have the gears swapped in the new year. Then I seen a youtube video, stupid video about nothing in particular, but he brought up one good point that really stuck with me. He said, "the 3.42 gears are nice for driving around empty", (which they are) "and I just drive in 5th when I tow". This opened my eyes to that possibility. I have myself a gearing and speed calculator I built in excel, so I did the calculation, and it looks pretty good.
rpm trans* diff tire size (dia) km/h engine to wheel gearing 1420 0.63 3.42 35 110 2.1546 1840 0.816 3.42 35 110 2.79072 1700 0.63 4.1 35 110 2.583 2200 0.816 4.1 35 110 3.3456 1540 0.63 3.73 35 110 2.3499 2000 0.816 3.73 35 110 3.04368 1700 0.63 4.1 35 110 2.583 1760 0.63 4.27 35 110 2.6901 1880 0.63 4.56 35 110 2.8728
*(for those not familiar, 0.816 is the published 5th gear ratio and 0.630 is the 6th gear ratio for the 68RFE)
So you get the fantastic low rpm and good mileage when empty with the 3.42 gears. But if I down shift to 5th, it puts my complete final drive ratio between a 4.27 and 4.56 gear set, if I were in 6th with those gear sets.
With 3.42 and 5th, the trans slows the rpm a little, and then the diffs bring the rpm back up a little
With 4.10 and 6th, the trans slows the rpm a lot, then the diffs raise the rpm a lot.
The end result is the same (giving me a driven speed of 110 kmh), and maybe a theoretical mechanical advantage of revving 140 rpm higher with the 5th and 3.42 combo.
Is there any advantage to having a slower drive shaft? Cause that's the only difference I see.
I think, at least for the short term, I may be better spent putting that money I had planned for gears towards head studs.
Thoughts?
Bookmarks